Saturday, December 29, 2012

The Truth about the Non-Being Theory


                                 

                                                                                                                                

                        The  Being theory emphasizes the truth about the existence of Existence whereas the Non-Being theory chooses to belittle the Being theory and focuses on the theory that at the inevitable end Existence is primarily about being non-existent and that what remains  is only the Non-Existence. As we travel into higher states of consciousness we realize that though the Universe may shrink down to size ground zero and nothing of the cosmos may remain, the truth is that the cosmos has only undergone a process of renewal and has dissolved back into the same invisible microscopic particles like the moment before the creation of the cosmos. The theory that supports the Non-Being ideology and that at the end the entire story is only about the Non-Existence just because the entire Universe finally goes point blank is in fact an invalid theory. In reality, the truth is that the cosmos is only undergoing a creation, sustenance and renewal process. If we perceive of the entire manifested Universe as the most Supreme Godhead or Brahman we can receive the vibrant living God particles before the creation and after the dissolution process of the Cosmos as the same Supreme Being, God or Pure Consciousness because very competent and spiritually advanced souls realize that everything that animates existence is Pure Consciousness or God. When we perceive of Brahman or the most Supreme Godhead as the entire manifested Universe, the same reference can be used to designate the invisible microscopic particles  after the great dissolution process of the Cosmos because, visible and invisible, it is one and the same.



                           Now, declaring the notion that a spiritual aspirant can choose between the Being and the Non-Being theory after transcending the seventh plane is professing a false meditative growth process. Where is the choice for a spiritual aspirant to choose between the Being and Non-Being theory when God, The Eternal Reality, is the only Supreme choice? There is no facility for a choice between the Being and Non-Being theory after transcending the seventh plane. A so-called Enlightened being who dictates the Non-Being theory among his disciples is only half realised  whereas an Enlightened being who instills that God is the only Supreme Reality among fellow human beings can be believed  to  be a truly achieved and liberated soul.



                    “God alone is real, all else is insubstantial and transitory”

                                                                                                                  -Shankara (8th Century)

Or to put this saying into more simple terms – “God alone is real, all else is unreal and temporary”



                  If one professes that the Non-Being theory is a valid one just because the Universe ultimately dissolves and nothing remains it only implies such a preacher is spiritually incompetent and unfulfilled because the entire manifested Universe, Brahman or the most Supreme Godhead has not dissolved and disappeared but only has undergone a process of renewal. Everything in Existence undergoes a process of creation, sustenance and renewal.



                       All these false teachings about the Non-Being ideology started flaming up the jungles of human beings once the great Buddha left his mortal body to the state of Mahasamadhi. The point is Buddha was not an atheist or a disbeliever in God. There are very strong validated beliefs from great saints to support the belief that the great Buddha only chose to remain silent about the existence of an Infinite Being.  It totally amazes any devotee of God when trying to conceive of the great Buddha, the ninth incarnation of preserver of planet earth-Lord Vishnu, as an atheist and a professor who professes that the human soul is non-existent. The truth is that the followers of Buddha spread the message that he was an atheist just because he chose to remain silent about the existence of God . It was the followers or so-called religious people  and not the spiritual disciples who turned Buddha into a hot property atheist overnight because they truly believed Buddha was the first in the succession of a long line of saints since the pioneering spiritual days who did believe that God did not exist .This scribe is willing to blow a trillion French  kisses onto the skinheads of every Buddhist monk who claims that God does not exist nor the soul because it is only after transcending the sixth plane that one is God realized and besides, we already have scientific evidence that a soul exists. And what would my dear readers think is happening the moment Buddha is believed to have entered the body of one of the most radical professors in human history? Buddha wanted to convert someone into a world teacher and is said to have entered the body of a very, very radical, non-being saint to convert him into one. The moment Buddha is said to have entered his body a grand and lavish revolutionary picnic is started to conquer planet earth with its non-being ideology. 

       

                 Relating one such popular commune in Nepal, this particular revolutionary picnic happens to be only about disciples posting semi-nude blow-up of themselves with similar issues in the daily paper to draw potential disciples to ones commune, by leasing out the quarters in one's commune like shanties in the nude beaches of the Caribbean for anyone willing to hire the quarters to fulfill their ever sensual desires for sex. And there is this chaturalingam who is a disciple of Osho and is such a cunning sly fox that he claims that the direct incarnation of Buddha, His Holiness the Dalai Lama, is sex-starved and sex-hungry. Why? Because sex is their principle tactic to draw followers to their commune. What a hypocritical and shameful act of maligning- a disciple of Buddha slandering a direct incarnation of Buddha for unsuitable gains. These disciples who pose semi-nude in the papers relay their masters legacy that sex should not be suppressed but expressed, spearheading their masters principle marketing strategy with the issue of sex because sex is the greatest demand in the world ,the most sought after thing in the world after money. What's more, is it the essential and primary nature of an Enlightened being to market sex to keep the  Non-Being theory thriving in a bid to win the long drawn rat-race for spiritual supremacy? And what about conniving to become a world teacher?



                                           Do you think you can take over the

                                                   Universe and improve it?

                                              I do not believe it can be done.

                                      Everything (and everybody)under Heaven

                                    Is a sacred vessel and cannot be controlled

                                              Trying to control leads to ruin

                                                   Trying to grasp we lose.

                                                                                                        -Lao-Tzu in the Tao Te Ching





                     God's mission is going to end up in great jeopardy if we have a world teacher who could not accept a single thing in his life, is an atheist and spreads spiritual violence by misguiding people into imbibing a false theory.



                     The entire Universe exists out of a co-existence of the opposites, out of the positive and negative. The positive is the pole and the negative is the anti-pole. There has to be a correlation of the pole and anti-pole for the great Divine play of the Divine Mother to be carried out and executed. Here on planet earth the Being theory is the pole whereas the Non-Being theory is the anti-pole. So for the practical, realistic and eternal Being theory to exist and thrive the opposite, negative anti-pole, the false Non-Being theory had to be invented, executed and circulated by the Will of God. People like Osho, we can say, were only  mere puppets, instruments in the hands of God. The mechanism and the truth behind the existence of the Non-Being theory is non other then the aforesaid theory. In fact, the creation and existence of the Non-Being theory was a Will of God and no one is in a position to judge this theory but this scribe chooses to profess for the Divine Mothers eternal theories instead of preaching for spiritually inadequate transsexuals.



                Affirming the eternal existence of God is the only spiritually and practically applicable thing to do and this is exactly what truly liberated souls do whereas spreading the misguided notion about the false Non-Being theory only furthers plus adds fuel to the fire of spiritual violence. False Prophets are not like Sri Sathya Sai Baba who instills the values of ancient teachings but the ones who spread and rekindle false theories. If false Prophets were the ones who preached and taught ancient teachings then someone like the great Mr.Dipak Chopra also had to be one because Mr. Chopra teaches meditation techniques that existed several thousand years back and still till this present day instills in us spiritual seekers the eternal values of Vedic Science.




                   Finally, it can be suggested to fellow meditators and potential seekers to stress and emphasise that they climb at least to the sixth spiritual plane to be  God realized and to  realize what God is about. Any state above the fifth can get senses revived in an aspirant that the only, permanent and eternal presence ever realized on planet earth and the entire Cosmos is that of the Divine Mother.



                Let us all fellow meditators and potential aspirants work and toil hard and be strong of an intense resolve to abide in God forever and may our future generations live to see the turn of this century to see planet earth filled to the brim of God realized people.
                                    (This article is the copyright of Ashwas Thapa)

No comments:

Post a Comment